Why Trapping is Still a Necessary Tool in Wildlife Control

In the realm of wildlife control, in California particularly, there continues a debate on trapping being a necessary tool to control wildlife.

The Challenge of Structural Exclusion

Not all structures can be properly excluded from wildlife intrusions. This is especially true for buildings with specific types of foundations, such as those on block and pier. These foundations often have gaps and vulnerabilities that are difficult, if not impossible, to seal completely. Historical buildings present another challenge. Many of these structures, due to their age and construction methods, cannot be modified without compromising their historical integrity. Similarly, mobile homes, particularly those owned by seniors, can pose significant exclusion challenges. The cost and complexity of thoroughly sealing these homes can be prohibitive, leaving trapping as the only viable option to manage wildlife intrusions effectively. These problems are magnified when dealing with rodent infestations like rats and mice that breed rapidly and can open holes and create openings in the tiniest of construction gaps. Squirrels are more than capable of chewing through wood siding and raccoons have been know to rip open gable vents.

Economic Considerations

Exclusion methods may be prohibitively expensive. Comprehensive exclusion involves sealing all potential entry points that mice, squirrels, bats and raccoons can exploit. The hole does not have to be large enough for a raccoon to fit through, it has to be large enough to exploit and cause a larger hole.  This process when done right, which be a labor-intensive, material heavy and for some it is a costly process. For many property owners, especially those with limited financial resources, this expense is simply not feasible. Trapping, on the other hand, provides a cost-effective solution to manage wildlife issues without the need for extensive modifications to the structure.

Protecting Agriculture and Livestock

Wildlife can cause significant damage to agriculture and livestock, which translates into substantial economic losses for farmers and ranchers. Animals such as raccoons, opossums, ground squirrels and coyotes can destroy crops, kill livestock, and contaminate food supplies. In these situations, trapping is not only necessary but also critical to safeguarding the livelihoods of those who depend on agriculture and livestock for their income. By controlling the population of these nuisance animals, we can prevent substantial economic damage and ensure the stability of food supplies.

Humane Trapping Practices

In California, the practice of trapping is regulated to ensure humane treatment of animals. The use of cage traps is mandated, which allows for the safe capture of wildlife without causing harm. Additionally, regulations require daily trap checks, ensuring that animals do not suffer unduly while in captivity. These measures demonstrate a commitment to humane practices in wildlife control, balancing the need for effective management with ethical considerations.

The Role of Trapping in Wildlife Management

Trapping plays a crucial role in wildlife management by providing a practical solution to problems that exclusion cannot address. It offers a targeted approach to removing specific animals that are causing issues, rather than attempting to remove all wildlife from a property. This targeted approach can improve the success of an exclusion program by removing the individual nuisance animal.

Conclusion

While exclusion remains an important tool in wildlife control, it is not always a feasible option. Factors such as the type of structure, economic constraints, and the potential for significant agricultural and livestock damage make trapping a necessary component of effective wildlife management. In California, the use of humane trapping practices ensures that the balance between managing wildlife and treating animals ethically is maintained. By understanding and utilizing trapping where appropriate, we can address wildlife issues effectively while respecting both economic realities and animal welfare.